We have to beat; Santorium, who do you think can do it?

-Treasurer Bob Casey, Jr.:  Bobby's 2004 Treasurer campaign showed he can win big.  Although his vote totals were likely boosted by Senator John Kerry's southeast Pennsylvania vote windfall, the fact is that he received the most votes of any candidate ever in Pennsylvania history and garnered nearly a half million more votes than Kerry.  His impressive showing has many Democratic operatives and leaders suggesting he take on Senator Rick Santorum in 2006.  But the fact remains that Casey is more interested in succeeding Ed Rendell in Harrisburg.  Democrats should not count on Casey to take on Santorum... but for the strength of his potential candidacy he remains on the list.
-Former Congressman Joseph Hoeffel:  Hoeffel just never caught on in his 2004 Senate campaign against Senator Arlen Specter.  While some may argue that Hoeffel lost by less than 600,000 votes, analysts should remember that Constitution Party candidate Jim Clymer took most of his 214,837 votes from Specter.
-Former Treasurer Barbara Hafer:  It's no secret that Barbara Hafer and Santorum agree on virtually nothing.  A recent convert to the Democrats, she carries less baggage than other Democrats and could win a primary.  But without the Treasurer's office or Bob Asher and other moderate Republican financiers, Hafer is unlikely to raise the money she needs to compete in a general election.
-College Professor Chuck Pennachio: I don't know to much about him, but here is a link to his Senate campaign website www.chuckforsenate2006.com
- Former State Senator Allen Kukovich:  Kukovich's re-election defeat takes him off the A-list for 2006 Senate candidates, but not off the list entirely.  His defeat doesn't change the fact that he is popular with both wings of his party and now he has nothing to lose.
-Congressman Tim Holden:  The dark horse potential candidate for Senate is Tim Holden.  While he does follow the Klink/ Casey mold, Holden is a more nimble politician and could attract voters from both of Pennsylvania's Democrat parties.  However, having defeated Congressman George Gekas and trounced Scott Paterno, Holden may opt to settle in to what is becoming a safe congressional seat... a choice Joe Hoeffel probably should have made
-Chris Heinz:  Most rumors place Heinz running for Congress against Melissa Hart in 2006.  But with little to lose and access to an enormous fortune, Heinz shouldn't be ruled out as a possible 2006 candidate.  Democrats would be wise to remember that only one statewide candidate had a higher victory margin that Bob Casey Jr.'s this cycle... U.S. Senator John Heinz won by 1,484,951 votes in 1988.
-Democratic State Chairman TJ Rooney:  Fresh off impressive statewide wins for Senator John Kerry, Bobby Casey Jr., and Allyson Schwartz, Rooney remains popular with Democrat activists across the state.  The current Chairman of Democratic State Committee, Rooney has access to money and top operatives.  This may be his next logical step.
-DEP Secretary Kathleen McGinty: McGinty has a long resume, having served in the Clinton White House, Rendell Administration, as an advisor the to Gore for President campaign, and substantial experience in the private sector.  McGinty is the Democrat most likely to run that most Republicans have never heard of.


Poll
Who would you like to see run against Rick Santorum in the Pennsylvania Senate Race?
State Treasurer Bob Casey Jr.
2004 Senate canidate Joe Hoeffoel
Former State Treasurer Barbara Hafer (former Republican)
College Professor Chuck Pennachio
Former State Senator Allen Kuckovich
U.S. Congressman Tim Holdin
Chris Heinz
Democratic State Chairmen TJ Rooney
DEP Secretary Kathleen McGinty
other

Votes: 69
Results : Vote Link : Polls

Display:


heinz for senate (none / 0)

heinz could have a chance ,he would win big in philly and pittsburg and would probably have some strengh in the rest of the state.
kerry could campaign for him in areas he did well in and to be honest i think make this about george bushes presidency which santorum backs 100%.i`m pretty sure in 2 years the foreign policy of this country will be in utter turmoil with the economy no better than today. this guy is beatable.we need to make all elections in 2006 about bush and we could see big gains.
by temple1954 on Sun Jan 09, 2005 at 10:45:07 AM EST

Re: heinz for senate (none / 0)

No chance.

Unless mommy opens up her pocket book big time, Chris Heinz has zero chance.  He has zero name recognition, and since he has never been elected, he has no organization to speak of.  Apparently though, he is going to run for Congress, which is a much better starting point.

Casey probably has the best shot.  That said, he still only is a "maybe" for running.  Hafer looks to be the front-runner if he does not jump in.

Given his loss, I think it is doubtful Kukovich will run.  But, he was generally known as one the best, smartest and most ethical politicians in PA.  So, if throws his name in the hat, it could be interesting.

Progressive Philadelphia Politics: Young Philly Politics
by DanielUA on Sun Jan 09, 2005 at 11:36:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: heinz for senate (none / 0)

you don't think family name recognition would help? asking because I dont k now PA but was there on election day
by bruh21 on Sun Jan 09, 2005 at 11:39:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: heinz for senate (none / 0)

I don't think Heinz could beat Santorium, but I do think he can beat Santorium in drag (Melissa Hart) as she has never faced a good challenge and her district was held by Democrats the previous 16 years.
Councilman Bill Painter
by Painter2004 on Sun Jan 09, 2005 at 02:15:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Pennachio (none / 0)

He reminds me of another professor that none of the pundits thought could win a US Senate seate.
Bob Brigham Blog
by Bob Brigham on Sun Jan 09, 2005 at 12:48:49 PM EST

casey is anti-choice (none / 0)

This is bad for the Senate or the governorship. But think about the irony if he did beat Ricky: Republican Specter would be pro-choice, Democrat Casey would be anti-choice.

I'm backing Hafer at the moment. Heinz is a feel good choice but I don't think he'd come within a mile of winning (I could be wrong). Hoeffel has modest name recognition now. Unfortuately, he's recognized at the guy who lost to Specter. Don't know much about the others.

by evac on Sun Jan 09, 2005 at 01:30:21 PM EST

Hafer appeal (none / 0)

I voted for Kuckovich ine th poll (who I'd like to see run), but as to who I think has the best chance in November '06 - at this point in the race I'd say Hafer would make the strongest candidate.
by ScottC on Sun Jan 09, 2005 at 01:30:31 PM EST

ONLY CASEY (none / 0)

I hate the fact that we have to go pro-life to win but this is against Rick "Man on Dog" Santorum!!  We MUST win this race, otherwise expect Santorum to make a run for the Oval or be a top contender for VP, and we can't risk losing PA in the general.  I know many of you are thinking "Casey is the same as most republicans.  Why support him??"  The truth is that Casey is a progressive at heart.  Just look at Casey's positions on the environment, the economy, education, worker's rights, veterans, trade, and civil liberties.  As for Heinz, I think he would make a GREAT congressman, or another state-wide office but he is a little to ripe for the senate.  Give him another 6 years and when Specter retires, look for him to run.  So please bloggers, unite around a congressman who can end Santorum's reign; support BOB CASEY!
John McCain wants to stay in Iraq for a century.
by jkfp2004 on Sun Jan 09, 2005 at 02:31:06 PM EST

Re: ONLY CASEY (none / 0)

Agree.  Other than Holden, who I doubt will run, Casey is the best candidate to take out Santorum.  Abortion is not the only issue.  Aside from that, Casey and Santorum are diametrically opposed.  Casey can neutralize Santorum's support among the anti-abortion voters.  The question is whether pro-choice voters in SE PA sit on their hands and wallets, as they did in '00 when Ron Klink could have taken Santorum out.
by Paleo on Sun Jan 09, 2005 at 03:09:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: abortion (none / 0)

No it's not the only issue - but it's a hugely important one, and I think the experience of Ron Klink is an excellent example of why it might serve the Democrats well to nominate a pro-choice candidate.
by ScottC on Sun Jan 09, 2005 at 03:15:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Klink (none / 0)

He did better than pro-choice Hoeffel did against, the admittedly pro-choice, Specter.  A pro-choice Democrat will lose to Santorum.  That's just a fact of life.
by Paleo on Sun Jan 09, 2005 at 03:54:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Klink (none / 0)

I am not sure that is true.  Ed Rendell is very much pro-choice and dominated the sitting AG.  Arlen Specter is pro-choice, etc.  Do not assume that just because of the Casey legacy over PA politics, that Pennsylvanian's will only elect a pro-lif candidate.  Just as there are a good amount of Democrats in PA who are pro-life, there are a ton of Republicans in places like suburban Philadelphia who are pro-choice, as well.
Progressive Philadelphia Politics: Young Philly Politics
by DanielUA on Sun Jan 09, 2005 at 06:24:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Onorato? (none / 0)

What about Allegheny County Executive Joe Onorato (sp?)  I understand he is quite popular due to his cutting overhead and managing the budget in Allegheny County (Greater Pittsburgh).  In addition, he has proposed cutting many of the wasteful "Row Offices" in the county, which are useless money-wasters, so he has the mantle of a good government reformer.  I know that it is usually a probem to be from Pittsburgh in statewide races, but Santorum is from Pittsburgh also.

I haven't lived in Pittsburgh for many years now, so I don't know much more about him, except that he is supposed to be opposed to using government money to build a new arena for Mario.

by The Goatherder on Sun Jan 09, 2005 at 03:21:36 PM EST

Re: Onorato? (3.00 / 1)

Actually it's Dan Onorato, I would have put him in the poll had their been more room.  I don't see him as a likely canidate for the senate in 2006, like Heinz I don't really think he's ready, but if we could get him to run against Melisa Hart or Tim Murphy in the Senate that would be great.  My choice is Bob Casey in his latest race he won just about every county except some in central PA.  Casey pretty much won every western Pennsylvania county, here is a map and an article that compares counties won by Kerry and Casey to Bush and Casey's opponent. http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/local/states/pennsylvania/10501002.htm
Councilman Bill Painter
by Painter2004 on Sun Jan 09, 2005 at 04:50:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Kudos (none / 0)

I just want to raise a glass to the sentiment of beating the shit out of Santorum. Painter, you're absolutely right. Not only should we want this one bad because it's a seat we can pick up, and because this guy's a complete dick; we should also be motivated by a healthy fear that unless he loses his Senate run, he could easily be the VP or even Presidential nominee, something we really don't want. A guy from the North who talks like he's from their base in the South--that could be pretty bad for whoever the Dems nominate.

Let's keep up the chatter between now and then. And then maybe summer of '06, if we're not doing anything all that important... Anyway, I'll be thinking seriously about heading to PA.

by Colorado Gringo on Sun Jan 09, 2005 at 05:46:18 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.